20 what?

I can't shout, its 2011 and woofers amplify the voice better. We talk of change like its a stage or a moment when what it really is is a process, a period of failing but persisting at changing the way we behave, react to situations, and generally comport ourselves as individuals, personalities, or organisations. When we talk about this change, we should bear in mind that an engine that's not broken doesn't need fixing. Before we go about fixing it(if it is broken), we first diagnose where the problem is before we embark on fixing. Diagnosing the problem leads to knowing what the theme for change is. In the human personality perspective, it is knowing what portion of our character component we need to correct as a result of the fact that we are not satisfied with the response we've gotten on the subject from people or other media by which we undertake our self assessments as individuals. To ignore the negative response or result of the other medium of assessment is to remain stagnant and handicapped in some situations whichever way we choose to look at it from. We are not preaching acceptance or validation from others, we are just saying since you can't see yourself and we can, since I can't see myself and you can, your/my objective judgement(I.e. void of sentiment) would be a valuable source of data collection for my self assessment. That is not to say that you should not take a critical personal analysis of the feedback we are getting before discarding or basing the need for change on this data. In essence, that 'I don't give a hoot' attitude, we off'd that a while ago, if you're still on that then you need a change of calendar.........